The United States of America celebrates on July the 4th (i.e. today) their Independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain. I have written before about how surprised I was that US citizens called themselves “Americans” and about the common practice of calling the US “America”. Canadians, indeed, are very prone to this practice, whereas Mexicans use the word “estadounidense” (which means, “from the United States“).
Credit: Kris Krug (Static Photography)
Having embedded myself more in the tech/social media community, I’ve actually started to make way many more friendships with Americans who have chosen to move to Canada for various reasons. Some of my very good friends in the tech scene are indeed American-born, but decided to move to the land of hockey, beer and maple leaf. I am very glad that they decided to do so, because I am blessed time and again for having such wonderful people in my life. I have 3 American nieces and nephews (born in the US), two of my brothers live in the US (and teach in American universities).
One of my very best friends’ 3 nationalities is American, indeed. I have fallen in love with several American citizens (I’ve also broken up with them too, but that’s another story). I have educated US-born citizens at the universities where I’ve taught and my research has taken me all over the United States for a variety of academic conferences and events. There are many reasons why I am happy to be happy for American citizens. So, as I said last year, and I’ll repeat myself over here:
To my American friends who are now residents of Canada, hope you enjoy the celebrations, wherever you are! And thank you, United States of America, for producing some very fine young men and women who are near and dear to my heart… Happy Fourth of July!
As you may know, I’m doing Blogathon for the BC Cancer Foundation and dedicating it to my good friend Derek K. Miller (who has been battling cancer for 2.5 years already, and recently celebrated his 40th birthday!). Registration for Blogathon 2009 is open already, and I just found out that the BC Cancer Foundation has a blog and a Twitter account! I’m excited about that. I’m working with the staff at BCCF and setting up my donation page so you’ll be able to donate soon. I’ve also contacted a number of great bloggers who will provide me with guest posts so that I can in turn, help other bloggers as well (I type really fast, and I will stay awake throughout the Blogathon anyways). If you feel like staying up and writing 49 blog posts for charity, sign up here.
Both my brother in soul (HZ) and myself are pretty big fans of Delhi 2 Dublin, a wonderful Bangra/Celtic mixture band. We have been to several of their performances, and I learned through the Vancouver International Jazz Festival site that they have a concert (free) tomorrow 8pm. Details here. A friend of mine, very close friend of mine is having a party at her house tomorrow night so I’m probably not going to be going to this particular Delhi2Dublin concert (or possibly will be just swinging by to have a chance to see some close friends of mine from the offline sphere). But I thoroughly recommend Delhi2Dublin so go and see them!
Last year was my first, full-on, head-first 12 months of being involved in social media, both online and offline. Several of the events I attended were focused on the topic of blogger relations. Great friends of mine who spoke about the topic include Rebecca Bollwitt, Darren Barefoot and Kate Trgovac (I liveblogged their talk at Cossette Convergence ’08). I also live-blogged Darren’s talk at Third Tuesday on blogger relations. Up until last year, I was really not very ‘up to speed’ with the concept of sponsored blog posts, blogger relations and so on (and here is my own full disclosure: I’m in the early stages of a project that will require me to engage in blogger relations). I have personally learned a number of lessons from seeing how respected and trusted bloggers deal with sponsorships and marketing campaigns, and I have developed my own set of guidelines for when I am invited to an event, or for dinner, or to review a product. Take for example, the recent review I did of Tokyo by Kenzo. Kenzo did not pay me for that review, it’s a cologne I’ve used and I just wanted to share that information with my readers. On the side of events where I’ve invited to participate, I always disclose who invited me. The case of the Brew 2.0 campaign made a big impact on me in the way blogger relations were done because Hill and Knowlton really emphasized that they weren’t expecting me to blog about it (I know that there may be a perception of implicit responsibility/pressure, but quite frankly I didn’t feel it that way).
I have had companies sponsor giveaways on my blog and I’m delighted that they choose to do so, because (a) it does help spread the word about some of their products/events/services and (b) my readers really like getting free stuff and (c) I *love* giving away free stuff to my readers! It’d be also a lie if I didn’t admit that I also love getting freebies (like any human being – I still haven’t met anyone who doesn’t). But when I do get a freebie, an invitation, a set of tickets or passes to attend movies/musicals/theatre performances, I *always* disclose that it’s an invitation on the part of the company. I know for a fact that I have a reputation to maintain as a trusted blogger, someone who discloses his affiliations and is transparent and accountable. I would like to believe I have a solid reputation, and I want to keep it that way. I’ll continue with my policy of disclosing whether I’ve been invited or whether it’s been on my own dime.
For the record, up to today, all the reviews of restaurants you’ve read here have been 100% paid either by me or by a friend of mine who has taken me to breakfast, lunch or dinner. When I attend a restaurant on their invite, I always will disclose that it was a review in which, while not paid, my dinner was taken care of. And the great thing about having developed trust and a steady readership is that anybody who invites me to an event or offers me free passes or anything knows that I retain editorial control.. If I don’t like something, I’ll say so (in a polite and nice way). And when I engage in a bloggers relations campaign (as I’m venturing out and getting my feet wet on this particular element of the social media consulting spectrum) I’ll also give anybody with whom I liaise editorial control. That’s how I think we can maintain credibility. And I’m quite determined to stay a credible source.
I was reading an item on TechCrunch on the issue of ‘sponsored blog posts’ and ‘pay-per-post’ by Brian Solis, and that was the reason that sparked my interest. Apparently the FTC has created some guidelines on transparency and disclosure. I’ve received some interesting responses to my query on Twitter, but I’d be delighted to hear your take on this. Thanks, and have a nice weekend!
I have been very fortunate in that I have been the focus of several interviews with various news/media outlets. I have always been very grateful for all the coverage I’ve received (on 24 Hrs Vancouver for the Michael Jackson/Twitter debacle, mentions of my contributions to Blogathon 2008 and the work I’ve done with Vancouver Bloggers Meetup, on The Georgia Straight for the work we did with Mental Health Camp and in general, my blogging experience). This week, I’m The Georgia Straight’s Geek of the Week and I am delighted that Stephen Hui (Tech Editor of TGS) was able to capture both my worlds (social media/tech and environment) in the same interview. Please follow this link for the interview. Thanks so much, Stephen! It was an absolute delight
Three and a bit years ago (April 2006) I started blogging (anonymously), because I wanted to share my ideas with the world. I wanted to talk about simple stuff, environmental issues, etc. I blogged as “Hummingbird604” on an anonymous blogging platform (Blogger, or Blogspot as some people call it). For a very long time, I refused to have photos of myself taken. I didn’t even want to have my last name out there linked to a website. It’s only been in recent years (and particularly after seeing the success that being more transparent and open has brought me) that I’ve allowed myself to have photographs published of me, to have my full name published and to have not one, but two public Twitter accounts (if you’re curious, yes I do have a personal, closed, non-public account that only a few people have access to). I have been on the receiving end of the ire of more than one person who has had the nerve to attack me online. For years, I thought that being anonymous (i.e. just Hummingbird604 and not Raul, and not having my last name published anywhere) would help protect me from any kind of online attack. Now that I’m very public, I recognize that this is perhaps a utopic desire. Truthfully though, I have never endured really severe cases (on Twitter, comments on my blogs or emails) of online negative behaviour. And my readers and friends on Twitter are very good at coming to my aid.
Cases of online bullying (also called cyber-bullying) have been documented elsewhere (one of the most famous was that of renowned blogger Kathy Sierra and cyber-stalking). One of the most recent blows to any sort of legal recourse against cyber-bullying was the acquittal of the woman who created a fake MySpace account to cyber-bully then-13-yr-old Megan Meier. Sadly, Meier took her own life (apparently she struggled with depression as well). What kind of adult would have the malice and ugliness of heart to do to Megan Meier what this woman did (or to any other child, for that matter) is something that escapes my comprehension. I am disgusted, saddened, sick to my stomach to say the least. I have very young family members whom I fiercely protect and with whom I have shared the insights and knowledge I’ve gained from studying social networking sites for the time that I’ve been involved in the social media community. I now know a lot about Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and Twitter, and that allows me to be able to watch out for my family and myself, as well as monitor potential danger for youth in my family who spend a substantial amount of time online. I get worried when I read about things like this and this.
I have previously indicated in several of my talks that law and policy (particularly internet law) has always been and will always be behind in the times when it comes to the online space. Dr. Michael Geist (who is a Canada Research Law in Internet Law) has written extensively about the topic of internet law and copyright, particularly, but not too much about cyber-bullying laws. I found this post of his about Hedy Fry introducing a bill targeting cyber-bullying but not much has been done nor will be done in the near future. According to Wikipedia, California has introduced a bill (Assembly Bill 86 2008) focusing specifically on online targeting (bullying).
Helpful resources against cyber-bullying in Canada and elsewhere include Cyberbullying.ca, the Stop Cyberbullying campaign, the Wikipedia entry for cyber-bullying (as opposed to cyber-stalking) & the Be Web Aware Canadian site. Other friends of mine have written excellent posts about this topic, including Duane and Rebecca. Duane was the one who alerted me towards the acquittal of Meier’s cyber-bully.
While I agree that Drew’s acquittal has prevented some negative precedents in regards to who is responsible for the cyber-bullying and for which actions (apparently she was being sued for hacking MySpace, basically – check this Ars Technica article for more background), I am really heartbroken, because Megan Meier’s cyber-bully will never be brought to justice. And that’s really, really sad.
It’s kind of ironic for me to review Tokyo by Kenzo before reviewing my actual favorite from the Kenzo family (L’Eau Par Kenzo Pour Homme). But I had been sitting on these cologne reviews for too long (I most recently reviewed La Nuit De L’Homme (by Yves St. Laurent) and I had already spoken about two of the Kenzo variations (Tokyo by Kenzo and Kenzo Power) when I last guest-hosted for Lip Gloss and Laptops. I had also reviewed Euphoria for Men (from the Calvin Klein house) and have a few other colognes in my draft entries. But for now, Tokyo by Kenzo will have to do.
My first impression when I first wore Tokyo by Kenzo was the feeling that I was in the fast-paced, always bright and shiny capital of Japan. I have to admit, full disclosure, that I don’t particularly love Tokyo. My heart was broken by a historian who formerly studied Japanese Nichiren buddhism and Omotokyo, and who lived in Tokyo for over 18 months, so it’s sometimes kind of hard to disassociate myself from those negative memories.
That being said, Tokyo by Kenzo maintains the freshness of the Kenzo family (L’Eau Par Kenzo Pour Homme, my usual morning-mid-afternoon fragrance is one of the freshest colognes you can find). Contrary to L’Eau, Tokyo is intended to be worn in the evening/night. It has very strong woody notes (the high note was a bit overpowering for me). The middle and deeper notes had some ginger (as advertised on the Kenzo website) but I also found some hints of flowery scents (couldn’t quite capture what it was) and some citrus notes (clearly, keeping with the theme of the energetic city).
While I strongly approve of Tokyo by Kenzo as a night cologne, I definitely doubt I’d be wearing it in the near future. I have a broad range of colognes that suit my epidermal chemistry much better, like Envy (by Gucci), Drakkar Noir, Eternity (by Calvin Klein) and my trademark Herrera for Men (by Carolina Herrera). That said, I would strongly recommend Tokyo by Kenzo if your personality suits (i.e. if you are a man who likes going out at night and be flashy, bold, energetic and fun).
I had promised my dearest friends C, B and L that I would never reveal the secret about the ‘all-you-can-eat’ deliciousness of Ninkazu (located in Richmond, BC) but after finding them on UrbanSpoon I can’t really go on without telling the truth. Yes, Ninkazu is great. I recognize that part of the great experience was the fact that I had a wonderful time with my friends, but I’d also argue that the food was excellent. I particularly like their sushi rolls (California and salmon), their Dragon rolls and their nigiri. I don’t really hang out in Richmond anymore that much (because I really have been very busy and haven’t made the time to spend with C, B and L). But if I go soon, my next stop will be Ninkazu, for sure. Reasonable prices as compared to any other sushi place in the Lower Mainland.
I had a chance to liveblog two of the sessions of the recent “Chicks Who Click ’09” conference (one on “Breaking The Glass Ceiling in the Tech Sector” and one in “Privacy vs. Transparency in Social Media“). While I would have thought that I had listened to whatever my dear friends had to say already (after all, we all attend many of the same meetups, speak at the same events, have regular meetings with each other), I noticed a substantial number of insights, coming both from the audience and from the speakers. Of course, this may sound pretty non-sequitur, but the truth is, I believe that there is a point we all reach where we really can’t move much forward much more (i.e. the marginal increase in insight is small, while the amount of time spent on particular topics is high).
This preconceived idea of mine (i.e. the Peter Principle) was shattered this past Saturday. Even though I’ve closely followed the careers and social media insights of Erica Hargreave, Gillian Shaw, Monica Hamburg, Megan Cole, Alexandra Samuel, Rebecca Bollwitt, Maura Rodgers and Victoria Revay, I gained a substantial number of new insights at CWC ’09. For example, this is the second time I’ve heard Maura Rodgers (Strutta) speak about venture capital, investors and fundraising. Given that I have (most of my life) worked either for a university, a research centre, a consulting firm or for myself, I had rarely thought about having to meet with investors, “angels”, sharing a percentage of your business. Like this little tidbit, I was amazed at all the new things I learned from Rebecca, Megan, Alex, Gillian, Erica, Maura, Victoria.
I told Colleen Coplick too (as she made a few good points as well at the conference) that it was interesting how we have evolved in the space. Even I threw a few ideas of mine, findings that I’ve gained while spending time testing the platforms, the tools and sharing the same online space. For example, one of the things I shared is how my writing has shaped my readers’ behaviour as well. People who read my blog know what to expect, know what I’m going to let through and what I won’t tolerate (like bigotry, hate or aggression).
using social networking sites as mediating spaces that build bridges amongst individuals at the nodes of the network.
(although I’d now like to explore now two intertwined concepts = the networked production of social spaces and the evolution of each individual within the online social space).
I believe that as time has gone by, each one of us (the folks in the Vancouver social media/tech/PR scene) have evolved within both the physical space (we have gained more insight into the actual platforms) and the online space (we have tested the tools and created the online networks that then translate into the physical inter-relationships). I’m still not 100% sure how to tease out the main insight that I’m trying to draw here, but I firmly believe that there is still space for us to evolve even within our own physical spaces. Even if we are still hanging out with the same friends, attending the same events, there’ll be a turning point (a punctuated equilibrium) where the next evolutionary stage of ideas in social media in Vancouver will take place.
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this. Please drop a comment on the blog.
It was a dark and rainy morning of August, about a decade or so ago. I had already lived in Vancouver for a couple of years so I knew what I would be facing when returning to the land of maple leaves and hockey. I knew that I needed to leave Mexico yet again in order to fulfill my destiny, in the pursuit of my dreams. I had lost one of my aunts, my Mom’s sister, to lung cancer earlier that year. I knew that it would be hard for me to leave my Mom after such a devastating loss. I knew I was leaving behind a life of comfort and well-being (professionally speaking). I left behind a great job, well-paid, my friends from all the countries were I’ve lived. However, I went along with the ride, packed my bags and landed back again in Vancouver. For the past 10 years, I’ve moved back and forth between Canada and Mexico and every single time, people who ask me where is home, I always respond “Vancouver is where my heart is“. Canada is indeed my home. I *am* Canadian. Not by nationality, but by heart. Every time I travel anywhere in the world, and I arrive at the border, I always say that I’m coming home. And the beautiful thing is that the officers always tell me “welcome home“. It was in Canada when I first fell madly, utterly, completely and head-over-heels in love. I fell in love with a Canadian. I have enjoyed every single minute of my life in Canada, despite the challenges and the rough times. I have taught at one of Canada’s most prestigious universities. I have educated Canadians, and I have been educated in the Canadian public university system (my PhD is from a Canadian, top-tier university). I know that for many people, living in Canada is a escape from another country. In my case, this is not the case. I live in Canada by choice. I am skillful and well educated, so I really don’t necessarily need to live in a different country. I did not come to Canada escaping Mexico or any other country. I moved here because here is where I found what I wanted to do for my Masters, for my PhD, and here is where I’ve also worked to create a professional platform. I am pretty sure that I am not the only one who feels this way, but let me just re-iterate this: Thank you Canada, for all the opportunities, the challenges and more than anything, the friendships you’ve allowed me to create. On this July 1st, happy birthday to you, Canada!
There are some topics that are very ‘sexy’ for the community interested in the impact that internet has on society. However, I can’t say that net neutrality is really one of those topics. The ridiculous notion that internet service providers (ISPs) should be able to provide differentiated data transmission velocities depending on who is the client is the underlying rationale behind throttling. Steve Anderson is a media democracy consultant, advocate but above all of this, he is a wonderful human being with an amazing capacity to work really hard to make net neutrality a reality, and to stop large telecomms from throttling. In an effort to democratize media in Canada, Steve has founded the Campaign for Democratic Media. I consider Steve a personal friend of mine whom I admire and whose company I appreciate a lot, particularly when we are sharing a beer at the Lamplighter π – Steve, hope you enjoy your birthday (which, very befitting, is on Canada Day!) – Happy birthday!
I have been reflecting on this issue for a long while now, particularly because for me, it is an important and relevant topic. I had a meeting this morning with a number of government representatives who were interested in social media strategizing. I mentioned the phrase “be authentic” as one of the key elements of success in the implementation of any social media strategy. Even if my primary professional activity isn’t social media, I *always* get asked a question that I always answer with “well, I think it’s because I’m authentic both online and offline”. The question is – “what has made you so successful? why do people follow you on Twitter and why do they read your blog”.
I don’t particularly think of myself as successful, but I would attribute any success I’ve had in social media (and in general, in every single realm, but particularly in the ones where social networking comes to play) has been the fact that the Raul you meet in person at a meetup/tweetup/social event or on the street (I bump into people who recognize me quite a lot these days) is the same Raul you read online both on Twitter and on this blog.
How do YOU, my dear reader, identify authenticity online? Comments, as always, very welcome.
(Photo credit: Penmachine on Flickr). I remember a time when I started reading blogs (around early 2006) that I had read some advice on how to write from a guy who nicknamed himself Penmachine. He was, by all measures, an excellent writer and definitely knew what he was talking about. I started exploring his blog and found the many facets that comprise Derek K. Miller, now a good friend of mine. He’s a writer, a musician, a blogger, a podcaster, a geek, a father, a husband and overall, a fantastic human being. Derek is about ten times geekier than I am yet he has always been very patient when I ask even the dumbest questions… “hey Derek, how the heck do I separate the sound from the video on a PC?”. Derek’s podcast interview with Nora Young from Spark (CBC) is one of the best I’ve heard (on the concept of a digital legacy). Derek has even been kind enough to guest-blog on my site for Blogathon 2008, and I have high hopes that he’ll accept writing a guest blog for my 2009 Blogathon, which again will be for the BC Cancer Foundation. I had the pleasure of attending the BBQ that he and Air organized this past Saturday, and it was a great opportunity too because not only did I get to celebrate Derek’s birthday with his family, and many of our common friends from the Vancouver tech community, but we also got to do taste some tequila. Here’s to your 40th, Derek! Looking forward to more good times in the future!
I recently received an email from FUN (Friends United for Nature) and given the environmental focus of my blog and my interest in non-profits, I thought I’d write about them. James was kind enough to send me a plethora of information about FUN:
Friends Uniting for Nature (FUN) Society is a not-for-profit organization that run summer day camps off of the UBC camps. We teach youth ages 8-16 about sustainability, the environment and leadership. We focus on providing fun hands-on education and equipping youth with the skills they need to become leaders in their communities. Each week camps have a different theme, such as “Energize This!” (renewable and alternative energy), “Food FUN” (the sustainability of our choices in food production, consumption, and nutrition), and “Water FUN” (Water games and activities, to highlight the importance of water and how we use and waste it).
Activities include learning bike maintenance, building and racing solar powered cars, planting and growing our on food and veggies, sports, and leadership workshops. We also stress the importance of taking what the participants learn home with them. We have daily activities for them to bring home and talk to their parents about and complete. What’s more though, is that we work through Ashoka Youth Venture Project to offer our participants guidance and actual funding to undertake actions once the summer has finished.
It is only our second year in operation. Despite not receiving any funding this season, we have actually tripled our enrollment capacity and opened a trial camp in Victoria. We have managed to do this through the help of a ton of incredible volunteers and community partners. The funding cut, however, comes as a blow to our scholarship programme. We want to make the camps accessible to all and last year offered a third of our total enrollment to underprivileged and aboriginal youth. We can still offer a limited number of scholarships, but the exact number will depend on support from local businesses and friends.
I think the FUN programmes are great, and I’m sure they would benefit from donations and/or volunteer help. To check more about FUN Society, click here.
While for some people this may be news, for me it is still amazing to realize that I’ve developed such great friendships with a large majority of the Vancouver tech, social media and PR communities. After all, I really don’t exactly do tech. My primary field is environmental research. I’ve started to do more social media after a year and a half of testing the tools, exploring the platforms and undertaking projects. Of course, things have evolved after more than a year and a half, and now for me, it’s kind of part of my every day life to attend tech-oriented events. DemoCamp Vancouver 7 is not the exception.
Resurrected by my friends from Bootup Labs, DemoCamp Vancouver 7 will focus on social platforms. The two main presentations will be carried out by friends of mine too: Andy Peatling on BuddyPress and Rastin Mehr and Arash Sanieyan on Anahita Social Engine. In addition to the social aspect to DemoCamp Vancouver (i.e. seeing my friends from the tech community that I don’t get to see at other events), I am looking forward to the social networking platform description. I’ve become geekier more and more so I’m really interested in learning about BuddyPress and Anahita Social Engine. DemoCamp Vancouver takes place on Tuesday July 7th, 2009 from 6:00pm to 8:00pm at WorkSpace. Details on the event can be found on Facebook. I think you need to RSVP through EventBrite. The link should be there too.
It’s quite likely that some of the people who read my blog will take exception to my publishing a video of the Pussycat Dolls (yeah I’m not all that fond of their image myself, but I can’t help it – I love many of their songs!) but since my blog is, well, MINE, I figured I’d post a video of the song by the Pussycat Dolls that I enjoy the most – Hot Stuff (I Want You Back). I could listen to this song for hours. Hat tips to my friend Tris Hussey who first Blip.fm’d it.
Today (Sunday) I spent the morning with JT (we switched things around and decided to go for brunch instead of doing dinner, movie, walk and stuff). We ended up at The Nice Cafe (as usual), drove around, went for a walk to Killarney Park and ended up at the Avalon Farm.
After mass, I came home with some groceries and as I’m making plans for dinner and lunches that I’ll be packing for the week, I figured I needed a drink that would taste summery. Since I think I ran out of tequila, I decided to go for a sangria. This is the concoction I ended up preparing:
1/2 bottle of Sauvignon Blanc white wine
8 organic strawberries (about 2 handfuls)
6 ice cubes, crushed
6 table spoonfuls of sugar (I like my drinks sweet)
Blend on high, serve in chilled glass, garnish with slice of nectarine. Salud! π
HAT TIPS – To @vic_toria who named the drink – I’ll go with The Hummingbird!
Raul: Doyle describes 60 years of best practices, whereas this space is brand new. He was reflecting on this recently. It’s funny because he’s a PR guy so they’re the polar opposites.
3:57
Raul: GILLIAN
It is actually kind about holding up personal information. You don’t use your own voice in the newspaper, if you are a writer. You don’t share of yourself, you are telling someone else’s story. Gillian has been very deep in the culture of being very private.
3:58
Raul: It kind of presents a dilemma and she hasn’t totally resolved it. On the one hand, you DO want to be part of the dialogue, and Gillian is open to sharing a lot about herself. But on the other hand, even if she doesn’t cover tough stuff (like shootings and gangs), people don’t always like things we write. You don’t want to put all the people around you out there.
3:59
Deetells: @SmileyVegas So glad! Hope you liked the colors-couldn’t decide, so just sent both! You can never have too many shoes! π #cwc09
3:59
wired_crow: I’m glad to know not all panelists are not comfortable with sharing everything and that here’s a heavy dosage of caution as well. #cwc09
3:59
Raul: You kind of have to know that you don’t know who you’re talking to.
4:00
Raul: REBECCA
Something like 70% of women who go online don’t use their actual real name. Rebecca began only as miss604. It wasn’t until she got married that she put her married name. She has photos online out there.
4:01
Raul: It’s finding that balance. A lot of people don’t know the real Rebecca because of the miss604 identity. Rebecca does put where to find herself (maybe get a stalker some day). But not putting herself in danger.
4:01
Raul: Rebecca uses Facebook. Her Facebook page is generally herself. For her FB is private. Twitter is much more public.
4:01
Raul: Making them both the same and authentic, but also keeping that private life.
4:02
Raul: ERICA
Used to be incredibly private with her online life. Through working with the character she’s become more open. Part of that is because Emme is telling a story, and we tell all of her most embarrassing moments online.
4:03
zaellen: “Privacy vs Transparency-Where do you draw the line?”- Gillian Shaw, Rebecca Bollwitt, and Erica Hargreave. Moderated by Doyle Albee #cwc09
4:03
Raul: Erica’s family may not want to have their stuff online.
4:04
Raul: Erica works with kids a lot, she doesn’t put photos of kids online unless there is an explicit permission.
4:04
wired_crow: It sounds a little like every panelist has a slightly different line drawn between personal and online. #cwc09
4:05
Raul: Erica’s address is not available online, so she looks at the space from the perspective of an educator and a teacher. She doesn’t think that we should stop them from being online.
4:05
Raul: But she does think that we need to teach kids how to use the tools safely.
4:06
Deetells: Wrapping up today w/privacy vs transparency panel-love this topic, so many interesting perspectives. Then off to Earls at 1185 Robson #cwc09
4:07
Raul: DOYLE – What do you think of – is there something about you that your boss can potentially see?
Erica – The first thing a hiring person can do is look at the Facebook profile and/or the online presence. He looks at it from the perspective of “is there anything there that would ever provide concern to the side of the professional life”. So far, there isn’t.
4:08
hummingbird604: In complementing a great panel on transparency #cwc09 – putting stuff out there means having an online presence that is PERMANENT.
4:11
Raul: GILLIAN – As a journalist you have even more challenges (what if you tweet something that gives a political leaning – could that come back and haunt you?). When do you go off record
Gillian – As the columnist, you can have an opinion. You’re putting your name out there as an editorial. You CAN have an opinion. As reporters you’re supposed to provide a balanced coverage, you are supposed to be telling both sides of the story. You have to bear that in mind. When I write about online security and online reputation a rule of thumb is – don’t put anything out there that you would mind reading on the front page of the newspaper.
A politician that tweets something indiscreet or off-the-mark it’s out there, on the record, searchable and you can’t take it back. During the election, Gillian followed the election and what candidates were doing re: tech/social media. But she never ever said “I think Candidate A is a moron” because exaclty that, she can be next week the political reporter and your credibility is kind of destroyed. If you come out with an opinion and then try to step back and pretend that you’re telling a balanced story.
4:11
wired_crow: Issues being discussed: what image you want to present (the alcohol in hand problem) and your opinions interferring with your job? #cwc09
4:12
zaellen: great panel about privacy and transparency with @gillianshaw @miss604 and @ericahargreave #cwc09
4:13
mdassinger: This sounds like a great networking opportunity for us women who are immersed in social media: www.chickswhoclick.net/chickswhoclick.html
4:14
Raul: Doyle – Rebecca/online persona – something that you said as Miss604 haunted you as Rebecca or viceversa?
Rebecca – There’s not so much a separation between Miss604 and Rebecca, but she does filter what she says out there. She would show a balanced viewpoint. If something is really negative, she will not say “they sucked” – she’ll highlight the good points and that’s about it. It’s just kind of filtering what she says so that it is respectable, it is credible. It’s still what she feels but not what is going to be haunting anybody.
Mixing the online and personal identities so that they’re stand up. What she wants to have out there. Make sure that somebody doesn’t take a photo or don’t put it publicly.
If you are saying something in the online sphere and somebody gets a hold of that. If you really need to take it out of your chest, just call a friend.
4:15
Raul: Erica – not everybody is like Rebecca or Raul (who are big bloggers and very respected and respectable). There is no actual real code of ethics. There was a photo published from a fashion event where models’ stuff was really showing off. There were people forwarding this.
When you put on a costume you don’t have control over whether things are misplaced, etc. But if they come from a professional space, that photographer would never have another job in a fashion set. That’s what creates these problems. Not all of us have the same ethics. It’s scary.
4:16
hummingbird604: Very true – @EricaHargreave is speaking to the issue of having a code of ethics #cwc09
4:17
wired_crow: Ethics for people in the social media scene lacks policing and that causes a huge problem that leads to lack of respect. #cwc09
4:18
Raul: Megan Cole – the rest of the world is very voyeuristic.
4:19
5minutesformom: Great discussion about ethics on social media. #cwc09
4:23
Raul: Adapting the old media and overlaying with the new media – it can lead to some interesting things. The importance of being authentic. When I’m online, when I’m engaged with readers, friends, people in my networks, I am not anybody but me, I do try to keep the same authentic me. Of course the question is how far do you need to go to be authentic? Do you have to share every single detail of your life?
4:24
lisa_dawson: Transparency vs. privacy in social media: Just because you blog or tweet does not mean that you give up all rights to privacy. #cwc09
4:24
hummingbird604: I spoke to the issue of being open online does not mean being voyeuristic nor narcissistic #cwc09 I’m less narcissistic than thought
4:25
Raul: We are discussing the Associated Press guidelines for social media. They were really telling them how to do that.
If we don’t do it ourselves, do I as PR firm need to say that? Have I gone too far by not providing a Social Media Guidelines thing.
4:25
susancarraretto: Importance of being authentic but how far do you have to go? @gillianshaw #cwc09
4:25
ColleenCoplick: priv panel #cwc09 is interesting – point just came up abt online persona vs offline. ppl assume my online persona is same as me in person
4:26
Raul: Erica – They want to use her name. As we’ve been chatting… they want to use the online presence (Emme Rogers’ character). Are they going to be trying to guide what Emme is going to be saying.
4:27
hummingbird604: @ColleenCoplick In a way it is, but in other ways, I think your offline persona is richer and more nuanced and other aspects #cwc09
4:30
Raul: Rebecca – You need to make a separation between business and personal. Rebecca is giving an example of one of the producers updating the show’s Twitter account and doing some personal tweets. So you have to have your own personal account and also be transparent about who is tweeting in the name of the company.
4:31
Raul: Megan Cole – we are still discovering how to do it and what lines can and cannot be broken.
It is indeed a learning curve in this new space.
4:31
techtalkformoms: RT @5minutesformom: Great discussion about ethics on social media. #cwc09
4:32
hummingbird604: Well, I do hope that people are following along the #cwc09 liveblog –
4:32
lisa_dawson: Offline personas are so much richer than online personas. Unfortunately, people often assume they are the same. #cwc09
4:33
Raul: Whoever is tweeting as Telus, you’re only answering that. It is really worth writing and creating.
4:37
Raul: There is a lot of forensic specialists for computers – a prospective employer – profile mining – data mining about your profile. People coming out of college, recruiters may want to look at what’s on your Facebook.
4:37
Raul: Developing a Twitter ‘best practices’ thing.
4:38
wired_crow: Corporate identities vs personal. It’s nice to be personal but thr’s a line It’s hard but you have to be aware of the difft hats @cwc09
wired_crow: Best practices and guidelines are very important! When can you use the company name? This doesn’t feel like it’s a clear line either #cwc09
4:44
wired_crow: The way you write can guide your audience in what is appropriate in your sphere. – @hummingbird604 #cwc09
4:45
Raul: Rebecca – on handling comments from the transparency
1) People always say that people are talking about you whether or not. You might as well have the official message. One thing that Rebecca did was own some of the negative sides. Make sure that the positive message first and the negative message.
2) Negative comments – as Raul said, you set the tone on your site. You can tell that his readers feel the same way. It’s this whole thing.
4:46
Raul: People come to Rebecca’s site but not many comments – if it’s something constructive she posts it; if it’s something jerky – she doesn’t get into flamewars on her site.
4:46
lisa_dawson: Topic shift to corp social media policy: To have or not to have? Where’s the line between corp representation & personal opinion? #cwc09
4:46
Raul: It’s about what Rebecca wants to do on her site. Her site is very positive. If it’s something that you can definitely respond to, the way you respond to negative comments as a company – you can email that person public or privately.
4:47
Raul: Knowing to respond. They’ll respond directly on Twitter (@lululemon)
4:47
wired_crow: Know when to deal with things offline. – @Miss604 #cwc09 So true!
4:49
Raul: Where do you draw the line of how controversial you are if you feel you can affect friends or neighbours? do you have a responsibility there?
Erica – I think you have a responsibility. Sometimes that thing can happen without you necessarily meaning for it to happen. We sometimes run into these issues with Emme. Sometimes basically people will think that what’s going with Emme is what’s going on with the writer’s life and it’s not. She’s a story. They’ve run into problems with that from time to time.
4:50
Raul: Ethically – what are you comfortable with? Sometimes things can be taken in a negative way that weren’t necessarily meant in a negative way if that does occur. It means that you just have to be cognizant of the people in your life that you love and that sometimes, stuff might happen that they won’t like and that you just have to say “oops, I’m sorry, how can we fix this?“. But this can happen in a non-online space too, anyways.
4:51
Deetells: How many are coming to cocktails? Thinking about changing the location to make it easy. #cwc09
4:53
hummingbird604: RT @wired_crow: The way you write can guide your audience in what is appropriate in your sphere. – @hummingbird604 #cwc09
4:54
Raul: Gillian – Our web editors do moderate the comments on the larger site, but on their blogs (Vancouver Sun) they do it themselves. Comments go with the territoy. Those questions do come up. They can be issues of safety (Kim Bolan writes in an area where people are shooting each other on a daily basis). There’ll be people writing comments on her blog who probably know (insiders to the information). She has been awoken by somebody on her BlackBerry saying “you got to get this comment off your blog”. That is, indeed, a dilemma.
4:54
susancarraretto: Like @miss604, we keep the tone on http://www.5minutesformom.com positive and it helps keep our comments positive. #cwc09
4:54
Raul: Now comments become a judgement for all the writers who have to moderate their own comments. You do it yourselves on a certain level. Or you go to senior editors. Or you go to the lawyers. In her space she is mostly spared.
4:55
zaellen: @Deetells I’ll be there for an hour or so before i hit the road #cwc09
4:58
Raul: Rebecca – Has something happened to you online that has made you move your line back?
Rebecca – She was criticized 2 years ago about a photo that showed sort of ‘much cleavage’ according to some people. But people said “why did you remove that photo? It’s YOUR site!”.
Her husband is super supportive.
Rebecca does not respond/send an army of Twitter followers. Not making a big deal of trolls (behind the scenes it really does affect personally).
4:58
susancarraretto: @Deetells I’m planning on coming for cocktails. Walking distance is good. #cwc09
5:00
Raul: Erica – some photos have been negatively criticized and she sometimes has had to be thick skinned. One person mistook themselves in the storyline sometime.
5:01
Raul: There’s a degree of shyness to posting ‘gossipy’ stuff.
5:01
Deetells: Cocktails afterwards at Don Guacamoles directly across the street. Because who doesn’t like a good margarita? π #cwc09
5:02
Raul: Megan Cole has a question
When you have your own space, you monitor your online presence, etc. You don’t feed the negative side. You don’t feel the trolls. Erica mentioned that on Facebook you find it very difficult to interact. Facebook is good in that they can block people, etc.
There’s a lot of things that you can control on Facebook. They’re busy people but they are good at that.
5:04
hummingbird604: Have people found the liveblogs helpful? #cwc09
5:07
Deetells: @hummingbird604 Troll Management, totally my new favorite phrase! Thanks hummingbird604! π #cwc09
5:08
lisa_dawson: RT @Deetells: Troll Management, totally my new favorite phrase! Thanks @hummingbird604! #cwc09
5:08
hummingbird604: Now @Deetells is wrapping things up for #cwc09
5:09
susancarraretto: Great conference! Now time for cocktails. #cwc09
5:15
ColleenCoplick: #cwc09 after party moving to don guacamole’s on robson
jordanbehan: #cwc09 Made a very big impression on me in a very short time. Cheers @deetells, I came away inspired by the discussion in the room.
5:36
jordanbehan: High fives to @awsamuel, @megancole, @maurar and @victoriarevay the kickass panel at #cwc09. Apologies to Victoria for dodgy phone audio.
5:37
ColleenCoplick: Someone left a dell power cable at #cwc09. It’s at the listel front desk.
5:59
sundi_moz: @Deetells Within walking distance of your room would be a good idea! ;p #cwc09
6:16
sonsryan: @deetells Thx for bringing #cwc09 to Vancouver. I am so inspired by the panel who presented today.
6:41
awsamuel: Celebrating the mutual support vibe from today’s #cwc09 by following its tweeters.
7:59
ColleenCoplick: home from #cwc09 and the *appalling* service at don guacamole’s. I’ll go back and give them one more chance, but oi that was horrid.
10:15
hummingbird604: @ColleenCoplick sorry to hear about the horrid service at Don Guacamole’s – it was good when @miss604 and I went #cwc09
10:19
hummingbird604: @raincoaster I`m a good grasshopper – I talked about Troll Management 101 – bring the flamewar to YOUR territory – at cwc09
10:32
hummingbird604: @RobCottingham You should be proud of @awsamuel – she gave such a great preso at #cwc09 – and praised her husband like there’s no 2morrow π
10:43
RobCottingham: @hummingbird604 Thanks, Raul – I’m a very, very lucky fella. #cwc09
Raul: Megan Cole – I worked a little bit in traditional media. I had an entrance into the social web. I was web-designing and we all have our “aha” moment and I was lucky to be working with the CBC in the Torino Olympics, she started a blog with the “behind the scenes” and at the time she was hiding it from the CBC (her employers) and she was broadcasting that to the internet, and her experiences running these venues but blogging about them.
11:39
wired_crow: nxt up, Women in Tech Panel w/ @megancole, @victoriarevay, @awsamuel, @maurar & @jordanbehan hosting, #cwc09 (forgot 2 add hashtag)
11:39
Raul: That was only 3 years ago. Megan jumped into a social web marketing director (Agent 99) for a local design shop. Before people were calling it social media. It was Megan representing the company online.
11:40
Raul: That wasn’t all that long ago. It wasn’t really Megan being a journalist jumping into the field (Gillian is an actual journalist). She had this side-gig. What’s the transition to splurge now.
11:41
Raul: VICTORIA REVAY
Can you quickly tell us about Splurge? – It started not too long ago. Victoria met Megan for coffee and Victoria was freelancing.
11:42
Raul: Megan will sum it up – they both had been working on the web and this is how you start a web start up- they met for coffee and knew each other. They were both frustrated with what was happening online for women and disheartened with the content.
Victoria is an excellent writer and they wanted to build a tool that would change the web and women could implement into their lifestyles. They both have varying skill sets and get along very well and have the same sense of humour. They just said “let’s do this”.
11:43
Raul: They ended up meeting with a lot of people and brainstormed with them and then you get into the gamut of “do you have a revenue model“. What is your business model?
They really wanted to change the way things were going.
11:43
EricaHargreave: BreakingtheGlassCeilingPanel is starting! @maurar AlexandraSamuel @megancole VictoriaRevay JordanBehan #cwc09http://twitpic.com/8l9ci
11:43
socialsignal: Some great liveblogging from @hummingbird604 on #cwc09 Glass Ceiling session: http://bit.ly/R9OIE
11:44
Raul: ALEXANDRA SAMUEL
The funny thing about my experience – Social Signal is the first business that I’ve worked in (before I was in government and public service). Alex decided to do a PhD dissertation on the impact of the internet on public participation).
11:44
Raul: Alex started blogging (Rob Cottingham is her husband and partner). As the social web started happening in 2005 they blogged about the new tools that they were doing. Alex had researched online participation for 10 years. They both were working on testing these new tools.
zaellen: right now #cwc09 “Breaking the Glass Ceiling-Women in Tech Start-ups”-Megan Cole, Victoria Revay, Alexandra Samuel, and Maura Rodgers.
11:46
Raul: All of these really delivered on the online participation and how organizations could be using these tools for public participation and citizen participation. Their first client asked them to build the site (in 2005, way before people started doing social media).
Alex is describing how they created tools to get people to participate online. They had the opportunity to help people and companies use their projects and how things could be done in this space. VanCity’s online framework was their third project.
11:46
Raul: JORDAN – Both women are Presidents of their companies (Alex and Maura).
11:47
hummingbird604: I love how @awsamuel is sharing her experience researching for her PhD – we are both research geeks π #cwc09
11:47
monicahamburg: Thanks everyone for support & tweets! – P.S. “Making Ultimate Porno refers to this post π http://bit.ly/d9JMC #cwc09
11:48
Raul: MAURA RODGERS
Started her own marketing consulting at the time (for a couple of years). She moved to California from Boston and Danny Robinson (her husband) is in the tech business and she came home from one of her business trips and they had this huge wall map. He took it off the wall and he said “this is what we are going to do”
5 ideas, just stapled to the wall. They just jumped in and they had no knowledge on how to start a tech business, how to raise money, what was key at the time was … finding the right people to do it with.
11:49
Raul: How important it is in selecting your co-founder. It is challenging to start a company with your partner, but Danny and Maura have different strengths (1998) – co-branded internet access. At the time K-Marts and Targets and all the big companies were trying to figure out a way to get online and have people shop online. So they offered free internet access for them, branded it for them, partnered with Yahoo! – delivered advertising through the application they created and they had 30,000 users a day (the fastest growing in the business)
11:49
Raul: It was dial-up. At the time what was also being innovative was that – they offered ‘full motion video’ advertising.
11:51
Raul: Procter & Gamble were looking for this kind of advertising and saying “there’s so much opportunity”. They were growing (their start up) like crazy. They raised tonnes of money through venture capitalists and Silicon Valley investors.
11:51
Raul: Align yourselves with your investors and make sure that they offer a lot of value.
Jordan
11:52
ZoomAlbum: at #cwc09 in Vancouver. So many amazing, interesting women in tech doing cool things π
11:52
hummingbird604: I love @jordanbehan’s way of moderating. I’m inviting him to my next event, period #cwc09
11:52
ZoomAlbum: get to do a ZoomAlbum giveaway here #cwc09
11:53
zaellen: we’re about to get hard and fast rules of starting a tech company @megancole #cwc09 ~ community is your asset
11:54
Raul: Both Megan and Maura were describing how to start up
Megan – your community is your best asset. They both (Victoria and Megan) have a passion for it. So now what? They went to their friends and media community and said “here is our first idea“. Oh and yeah, there were tears. In 6 months they have learned so much and gained so much knowledge from a lot of different avenues.
You get to the point where you got an executive summary, you understand your revenue model, your business model. You have a business plan. That first level of money can easily come from friends and family. Include your immediate community that is knowledgeable.
EricaHargreave: Cool! Both AlexandraSamuel & @maurar own their company’s with their husbands, & they are both the presidents of the company. #cwc09
11:55
Raul: Megan talked to a lot of people who know a lot about stuff. They wanted to deliver a product directly to their mobiles. They talked to lawyers, others. You need to open up your channels, and ask questions and figure out things.
11:55
Raul: Surround yourself with good people (rockstars).
Maura’s take on the team building. – Strutta – platform for creating online contests. So having a co-founder that you trust is very important.
11:56
Raul: Especially in the early stages, the people that you choose to run your marketing and the developers, are not employees. Maura does not consider herself an employer, they are in this together. They are family. Those people in the very beginning help shape how your company grows.
Know your own strengths and find people that are stronger and smarter than you – and find who can fill those gaps.
11:57
EricaHargreave: ‘In tech start-ups, it’s important involving your community, especially the people you love.’ @megancole #cwc09
11:57
wired_crow: Out of juice for my netbook. Hard to tweet play by play for panels but great hearing these startup experiences from these ladies #cwc09
11:58
zaellen: know your own strengths and find people to fill the gaps. find peeps who are smarter than you ~ @maurarodgers #cwc09
11:58
Raul: Alex – exploiting the strengths of women collectively
When Alex was thinking of her list of 5 tips – issue of work/life balance. For women in tech startups the experiences have a lot to do with balancing. The first thing you need to do is throw out the concept of balance.
You either are walking out on your kids saying “please Mommy don’t go” or “hell I need to connect to the internet to be able to talk to my kids”.
11:59
Raul: Think about the fact that you’re ‘just a techie’. The secret for Alex is the way in which social media supports us to be as transparent as we want to be in our personal lives. If any of you follow us on Twitter. They banter online. Their kids have a Twitter feed. They use to refer to them by their twitter handles.
11:59
EricaHargreave: ‘Important to know your strengths & find people that are strong & creative to fill in the holes & encourage them to do so.’ @maurar #cwc09
11:59
hummingbird604: Alex and Rob created Twitter feeds for both their kids. That’s AWESOME. #cwc09
11:59
zaellen: work life balance is like a teeter totter…one extreme to the next. @alexandrasamuel #cwc09
12:00
Raul: Alex is not willing to work after hours. They launched Web of change 2 weeks before she had given birth to her first child.
Being transparent about the fact that you have personal commitments is the first step.
12:00
sonsryan: RT @hummingbird604:I love @jordanbehan’s way of moderating. I’m inviting him to my next event, period #cwc09
12:01
Raul: Megan – Women need to support each other as women. Apparently women are stopping each other from advancing. And Megan really doesn’t like this (article in the New York Times)
12:01
Raul: It’s really important that women support each other in the tech community.
12:01
[Comment From Rob Cottingham] Quick clarification: it was actually ChangeEverything we launched 2 weeks after our second child was born.
12:02
wired_crow: Abandon the work-life balance idea. Integrate the 2 instead of 2 diff boxes. Hmmm, why put only the techie persona on only at work? #cwc09
12:02
Deetells: This is such a fantastic panel! Women supporting women, doing the juggling act, but making it work & kicking ass in tech! #cwc09
12:02
Raul: Men in our era are so supportive of women. Chris Messina and Tara Hunt (they broke up but Tara runs BarCamps).
12:03
EricaHargreave: ‘impt that u value the ppl helping u to start-up a new company & empower them to feel ownership over the company or project’ @maurar #cwc09
12:03
sonsryan: Listening to my lovely boss @maurar speak on the “Breaking the Glass Ceiling – Women in Tech Start-Ups”. #cwc09
12:03
Raul: If you don’t have the kind of support by men (and by other women) then things don’t really work.
12:04
zaellen: @jordanbehan first tech event where he’s been outnumbered by women #cwc09
12:05
Raul: Maura – the difficulty that you have with investors. Maura has been in situations where she was the only woman. It was an invite only event and for entrepreneurs and investors. She introduced herself but was overlooked by one person who represented the Angel community. But the man did not introduce himself.
12:05
Raul: There are fewer of them in technology. Maura hasn’t had many issues with investors because (possibly) she is partnered with a man. But Danny has done a lot of the capital raising.
12:05
Raul: Aligning yourself with the right people – introductions are very important.
12:06
Raul: Alex is adding one thing about working with your partner.
12:07
Raul: One thing to be really clear is, as Jordan alluded to, there are different kinds of balances. Who is the front man(woman)? In their business, Alex is in the leadership role, she does not do any decisions without consulting him, but Alex is in the lead.
Rob is an extraordinary man. They evaluated whether they wanted to have a business together. They wanted to model a different balance for gender.
12:07
monicahamburg: Gross & worrisome that this still happens: Being dealt w/ differently by men (esp. of different generation) because of your gender. #cwc09
12:08
lisa_dawson: RT @wired_crow: Abandon work-life balance idea. Integrate the 2 instead of 2 dif boxes. Hmm, why put techie persona on only at work? #cwc09
12:09
Raul: Alex had a meeting with a guy who made an inappropriate comment about whether they asked whether they (each of one) were ‘gay’, like “what’s your arrangement”. But they are just a great couple who know how to work with each other.
I’m really impressed with the positive way in which Rob and Alex work.
12:10
Raul: THROW WORK BALANCE OUT THE WINDOW
If you are going to start a tech startup. When you are creating a product (Maura says). Scale is a big thing.
12:10
EricaHargreave: Panel discussing issues of doing biz as a gal&what u do when men setup meetings that end up being ‘dates’.Sadly this has happened. #cwc09
12:10
CathyBrowne: @monicahamburg I’ve had that sort of experience before…doubly frustrating when you are ignored as a woman AND disabled! #cwc09
12:11
monicahamburg: Fascinating discussions re: startups, relationships, gender & related issues – @jordanbehan hit on fascinating & provocative items #cwc09
12:12
Raul: Question to Alex
What they do is they create online communities (social media presences) – some of those are for-profit.
12:12
Raul: Those would become startups.
12:13
Raul: They created a community for Happy Frog.
12:13
Raul: Change Everything – It’s an online community they created for VanCity. A list of changes you want to make and blog about them.
12:14
CatherineOmega: @EricaHargreave Dude, that actually happened to ME once. I think it might have made me even gayer. #cwc09
12:14
EricaHargreave: Also what do you do when men don’t treat you as the gal seriously in business? At SocialSignal, you’ve just lost their business. #cwc09
12:14
Raul: Could that become an independent community? Possibly. These things help.
The web space – when you look at the biggest success stories, they are often accidental start-ups. They ended up being this other thing. You really never know (as Alex says) to be really very responsive. People are demanding.
12:15
wired_crow: Business vs startup Business=consulting, service base; startup=selling an idea that turns into a platform. #cwc09 Still chewing over that.
12:15
hummingbird604: You have to look at opportunities and numbers, says @maurar #cwc09 – know what you’re going to build, know your stuff, research competitors
12:15
GillianShaw: @awsamuel on tech start ups: One of the things that is key about this whole sector is being really responsive. Be ready to change. #cwc09
12:15
Raul: * Have a plan * Be prepared to change and evolve.
MAURA – Align yourself with people who will help you build that.
12:16
Raul: MEGAN – They learned a tonne by researching. They went out of the gates a little too early. They knew from their gut and from other very well respected unofficial advisors that this could be really big and could actually work, which is really exciting.
12:16
jamjar_media: RT @EricaHargreave: what do you do when men don’t treat you as the gal seriously []? At SocialSignal, you’ve just lost their business #cwc09
12:17
Raul: They went running to the hill tops, and went back and switched a lot of things after that. You are challenged by a lot of people. You have to have thick skin. If people don’t respect you, then you don’t want to be around them. They are upfront about the fact that they don’t know anything.
12:18
EricaHargreave: @CatherineOmega Happened to me too! Total casting couch scenario. Made me wonder how blonde he thought Iooked. #cwc09 Highly insulting.
12:18
Raul: That they don’t know everything but they know a lot of things. They understand the language and have some hard answers for people. It’s ok, not to know everything “hey we haven’t gotten that far yet“. We are in a competition right now, learning that next week.
VICTORIA – Being women helps get away with it. For men would be a bit more difficult to say “i’m not sure what we are doing”. It kind of helps that we are kind of new.
12:19
Raul: ALEX
When she comes into organizations there’s that kind of “wearing us”. Knowing your stuff is important – you need to establish your credibility. You need to do the instant credibility. It gets Alex past the first 5 minutes (having a PhD from Harvard).
12:20
hummingbird604: Yes, having a PhD can indeed actually help with your credibility – I agree @awsamuel – #cwc09
12:21
Raul: QUESTION – JORDAN TO ALEX
As the community building expert, what is your advice for people in the room to stay in touch?
Alex loves Twitter. There’s a lot of energy. You want to stay where the action is happening. Boys do talk more than girls online.
12:21
GillianShaw: Learn all you can, be knowledgeable when launching a startup but don’t be afraid to admit you don’t know all the answers, @megancole #cwc09
12:22
Raul: On the Social Signal account – seeing people and dividing by the interest and the love. There are more women in her ‘love’ Twitter feed (i.e. good friends, etc.) – more balanced.
12:22
harrietglynn: technology, ain’t it grand -thanks! >> RT @hummingbird604 Chicks Who Click #cwc09 Twitter livestream – http://bit.ly/LOD7y
12:22
Deetells: @jordanbehan is a kick ass moderator! I love his enthusiasm and questions, he has captured some fantastic content! Thanks Jordan! #cwc09
12:23
Raul: DOYLE – Are there places where people can go? Is there enough, too much help for women?
EricaHargreave: ‘Regardless of gender in biz if u don’t know something, be honest & say u don’t know. Honesty & transparency is key in biz.’ @maurar #cwc09
12:24
hummingbird604: @harrietglynn Thanks! I’m liveblogging the second session (post – @monicahamburg) on my site #cwc09
12:25
Raul: Alex just finished a Forum for Women Entrepreneurs – 6 month program.
Raul: ALEX – it’s easy at times to feel in a sector that is pretty young. Most of these guys are pretty savvy. It’s easy to forget that there are structural imbalances. Alex was invited to the Industry Canada conference on the future of the digital industry. The power tech crowd. And 150 people in the room (20 women) 20 people who spoke, 1 women. The reality is … there are
12:31
Raul: There is a tipping point – where you can just feel it, that there are just so few women in the room that it’s just uncomfortable.
12:33
Raul: Inclusivity needs to be in everyone’s agenda. It’s not a ‘should’, not a moral imperative. The market is diverse. We need to reflect that if we are going to learn and make the best calls.
12:34
Miss604: @megancole says men whose target audience includes women could have benefitted from being here today #cwc09
12:34
lisa_dawson: Great suggestions for making Twitter more manageable, relevant RT @awsamuel: To focus your Twittering see http://bit.ly/twean #cwc09
12:34
Raul: MEGAN – In 7 years maybe this won’t be the same. Jordan is very forward thinking and of that group that thinks forward. 10 years ago Megan worked in Montreal, sports journalism. Montrealers’ intimidating backroom, old boys club. It’s all men in 3 piece suits. She should have been (to them) the cocktail girl. And that’s how she was treated. That awful feeling came back a few months ago to her and Victoria.
12:35
hummingbird604: 100% agreed RT @Miss604: @megancole says men whose target audience includes women could have benefitted from being here today #cwc09
12:36
GillianShaw: @hummingbird604 @awsamuel was talking about Forum for Women Entrepreneurs. www.fwe.ca. #cwc09
12:37
Raul: Erica Hargreave – in Yorkton – all the men had been addressing Erica first. She found that very interesting.
12:37
hummingbird604: @gillianshaw Yeah, captured on my liveblog – also @robcottingham and @miss604 gave me the URLs π thx! #cwc09
12:38
5minutesformom: RT @Miss604: @megancole says men whose target audience includes women could have benefitted from being here today #cwc09
12:40
hummingbird604: Ok, liveblog is over #cwc09 – lunch
12:41
Raul: LIVEBLOG OVER
12:41
Rob Cottingham: Bon appetit! Thanks everyone – a great session, even from the dining room π
12:51
Miss604: @hummingbird604 is liveblogging #cwc09http://tr.im/cwcliveblog I dont even have my Macbook on me (it’s kinda nice)
liamevans: ‘Ill second that…….RT @hummingbird604: Yes, having a PhD can indeed actually help with your credibility – I agree @awsamuel – #cwc09
1:00
wired_crow: Lunch is pretty good. I was skeptic of the soup but this is really really good! #cwc09
1:00
ColleenCoplick: Finally on my way to the conference that began 5 hours ago. #cwc09
1:00
wired_crow: Carrie McCarthy-Marketing your image-online and off next. Underscore on authenticity @cwc09
1:01
Miss604: Lunchtime at #cwc09 – Carrie McCarthy is speaking about “Marketing your image-online and off”
1:02
Raul: @hummingbird604 is having lunch [this is Rebecca]. We’re now listening to Carrie McCarthy speak about managing your online brand & authenticity.
1:02
Raul: “When people say ‘Dont just a book by it’s cover’, I totally disagree.” She adds “Yes let’s not judge but we need to be aware of what the cover is saying.” — “Communicate who you are in all you do” — Carrie
1:03
Raul: oops *judge
1:04
wired_crow: I like her! Screw the people that think you have to be in a suit. If you’re not going to be comfortable with it, you shouldn’t do it. #cwc09
EricaHargreave: Love the fact that CarrieMcCarthy on marketing your image just told me I don’t need to wear a suit to be successful. I can be myself! #cwc09
1:07
zaellen: Definition of style is how anything and everything is expressed – Carrie McCarthy at #cwc09
1:09
EricaHargreave: In developing, your online image, know what your drawn to. Listen to your body. It will tell you. #cwc09
1:10
lisa_dawson: instead of looking for balance, try think about proportion. #cwc09
1:11
sonsryan: Keeping your life in portion and being aware of what that portion is – Carry McCarthy #cwc09
1:11
wired_crow: Know when to let go, to quit. Don’t have to go through that dip where you are drowning. #cwc09
EricaHargreave: Being aware of what ur drawn to & what ur bodies telling you is echoed with those gut feelings in biz meetings. Listen to your gut. #cwc09
1:14
[Comment From Raul] Thanks to @miss604 for covering for me while I got lunch. She rocks!
1:14
EricaHargreave: ‘Don’t compare yourself to others. This causes pain. We are all unique snowflakes. Celebrate your uniqueness.’ CarrieMcCarthy #cwc09
1:14
Raul: The more that you know who you are (the core values) – to not differentiate those – look at how it impacts our own lives.
1:15
wired_crow: Really good point in that even in business, knowing yourself helps you make the decisions that align with your goals. #cwc09
1:16
lisa_dawson: @carriedanielle talking about creating a style statement, or your own personal brand for living authentically #cwc09
1:17
Raul: The more you are yourself, the more you’ll attract the right everything for you.
1:17
EricaHargreave: @IanAMartin I don’t look hot in a suit. I look uncomfortable and I look my best when Im smiling. Time to chuck out the suits. #cwc09
1:17
zaellen: Success comes from knowing who you are and walking the talk of what you believe in – Carrie McCarthy #cwc09
1:17
5minutesformom: RT @zaellen: Success comes from knowing who you are and walking the talk of what you believe in – Carrie McCarthy #cwc09
1:17
Raul: “the priviledge of a lifetime is being yourself”
1:18
EricaHargreave: Be authentic! Your brand should reflect you. #cwc09
1:18
GillianShaw: Make choices lined up with your core beliefs, says Carrie McCarthy, Style Statement expert at #cwc09
1:19
zaellen: Need to get Style Statement… Carrie McCarthy’s book…wasn’t fast enough for the giveaway #cwc09
1:19
wired_crow: Have anyone else ever found that if they wear the “wrong” thing that day, it hurts their decisions through the day? I’ve had that. #cwc09
1:19
Deetells: @CarrieDanielle nailed it! Love all the point, be who you are, totally authentic and own it! YES! #cwc09
1:21
EricaHargreave: Consistency important when your building your online image. #cwc09
1:23
hummingbird604: From “Good to Great” book – #cwc09 – what you’re very passionate about – Carrie McCarthy – company Patagonia
1:23
EricaHargreave: Book Rec from CarrieMcCarthy ‘Good to Great’ #cwc09
1:25
hummingbird604: Read The Sartorialist #cwc09 – takes photos of real fashion on the street
1:25
EricaHargreave: Another Book Rec from CarrieMcCarthy ‘The Leader’ #cwc09
I’m not yet at CWC ’09 but I know that by now, my good friend Monica Hamburg must be presenting on Twitter. So I figured I’d help by creating a live Twitter cascade with the incoming stream of tweets hashtagged #cwc09. It may help capture some of her talk
Raul: This twitter incoming stream liveblog should capture the #cwc09 tweets. It was launched around mid-conversation with Monica Hamburg.
10:23
zaellen: 90% of what u share on Twitter should be made up of personal insights & thoughts along w/ heavy dose of helpful links @monicahamburg #cwc09
10:24
zaellen: while 10% should be make up of messages that more directly benefit you @monicahamburg #cwc09
10:26
lisa_dawson: Applies to life in general and Twitter. RT @sonsryan: Start building relationships before you need anything @monicahamburg #cwc09
10:28
megancole: RT @EricaHargreave: Future workshop suggestion for @monicahamburg (via@IanAMartin) – making ultimate porno Dont ask. It’s a #cwc09 thing.
10:29
chicken_scratch: RT @zaellen 90% of what u do on Twitter should be personal insights & thoughts along w/ heavy dose of helpful links @monicahamburg #cwc09
10:29
Deetells: RT @EricaHargreave: Future workshop suggestion 4 @monicahamburg (via@IanAMartin) making ultimate porno Dont ask. It’s a #cwc09 thing. <3 it!
10:29
sonsryan: RT @EricaHargreave:Future workshop suggestion for @monicahamburg (via@IanAMartin) – making ultimate porno Dont ask. It’s a #cwc09 thing.
wired_crow: Found interesting site: hashtag.org that trends hashtags. #cwc09 Does anyone know there’s an official list of the most accepted ones?
10:31
oline73: RT @monicahamburg At Chicks Who Click – there’s still room if you want to attend. Info here: http://bit.ly/142ue9 #cwc09
10:36
Partnerpedia: Twitter is a real collaborative effort @monicahumburg. #Partnerpedia is a collaborative network for partner to partner communications #cwc09
10:36
Deetells: @monicahamburg engaging, passionate, funny and informative! Rockin’ the Chicks space! #cwc09
10:36
hummingbird604: On my way to Chicks Who Click #cwc09 – I created a Twitter livestream – http://bit.ly/LOD7y
10:39
chicken_scratch: @hummingbird604 Hugs to you for keeping us all in the loop (even the lurkers). Suffering withdrawal today, wish I could be at #cwc09
10:40
Deetells: RT @hummingbird604: On my way to Chicks Who Click #cwc09 – I created a Twitter livestream – http://bit.ly/LOD7y Hey Boulder & KC, ck this
10:41
Partnerpedia: Learning great Twitter tips from @monicahamburg that will help improve #Partnerpedia Twitter presence #cwc09
EricaHargreave: If u want to have a convo follow ppl that interest u.Don’t be egotistical&think that ur so interesting that ppl should just follow u. #cwc09
11:16
sundi_moz: RT @EricaHargreave: If somebody engages u negatively on Twit, don’t engage back. Let it go. They’re just making themselves look bad. #cwc09
11:19
EricaHargreave: Twitters about conversation, so engage, engage, engage & don’t be afraid to. You don’t need to give more info then you want to. #cwc09
11:20
EricaHargreave: RT @maurar: I <3 @monicahamburg. So many useful tips on Twitter. If you missed it check out slideshare.com/mhamburg #cwc09
11:26
hummingbird604: @WordSpring I’m live-blogging #chickswhoclick #cwc09 so just check my blog π
Minna Van is, in addition to being a good personal friend of mine, a very engaged entrepreneur who is very supportive of VEF Momentum. VEF Momentu is targeted towards younger entrepreneurs and startups in the early steps of their career.
Minna and Na’im invited me to their most recent event this past Thursday night at Nuba (the one on Cambie and West Hastings). I have to say that the food AND the service at Nuba are fantastic. The appetizers were abundant, I wish I could have enjoyed more but unfortunately, my stomach really couldn’t take more, because I had dinner like at 4.30pm. The event was really well attended and I had the pleasure of bumping into Paul Hillsdon, with whom I’ve been in touch ever since I started blogging but only met recently in person. Of course, Christy and Minna were there as were other of my friends who like me share offices at The Network Hub.
Jonathan Bixby – CEO and Co-Founder of Strangeloop Networks
Β
The talk revolved around getting results, especially during times like this… how do we prevent ourselves from taking an easy summer.
Jon starts with Michael Jackson. He saw him live in Sydney, Australia (on his History Tour). Going to this concert was unbelievable. The first moment, 100,000 people in the Stadium. All of a sudden, lights went out and all of the sudden, there was a giant screen and in comes, on a rocket ship, Michael Jackson. He starts flying through China, over the Great Wall, through Japan, etc. and he approaches towards Sydney. He goes through the city into the Stadium, there’s a blinding light. The rocket ship lands on the stage, door blows open, he stood there for like 5 mins, and he started doing moonwalking and Billie Jean, and the entire crowd started moonwalking. He is a true legend.
Jon does a quick poll of entrepreneurs. How many want to be entrepreneurs? How many ARE entrepreneurs? Have you written down a goal of how much money you want? How many of those who are waiting have written a date of when you want to be an entrepreneur?
In 1979 Harvard did a study of their incoming MBA class and they asked a very simple question – do you have clearly articulated goals? If you do, have you written them down? 13% of the incoming class had goals, they thought about them but not written down. 84% had not articulated their goal, and 3% of keeners who had a goal, written down.
In 1989 they did a follow up and did a survey of incomes of the incoming class. Those who had done goals were making twice as much money as those who had not. The keeners, the 3% written down were making 10 times more money. What he’d like to talk about tonight is the importance of setting goals and articulate them.
Why don’t people set goals? Jon thinks that people don’t set goals because they are fearful of failing and the rejection that comes with that. I set a goal… did you do it? No, I didn’t.
There’s two other factors. Fear of failure, fear of rejection. Also, people don’t know how important it is to set up formal, quantitative, hard goals. And then the third is “I don’t know how to do it quickly”.
1.- How do you set a goal? When Jon first started as a CEO he started Iron Point, 3 guys in the apartment. They snuck in every day, 6 phone lines. His office was in the bathroom. We needed goals, and not only goals, LOTS of goals. 7 pages of goals with 10 goals in each page. If you have 70 goals they are not real.
– Make it SUPER SIMPLE – Simplify your life. If you’re going to create a goal that is overarching for your business. You can create sub-goals under the larger goal. One goal for time period. You should have a goal for day/week at the most.
– Never create a goal that goes beyond 3 MONTHS – In our business today we have 40 employes, 3.5 into the business, setting goals into the quarter.
– Our goal has to be ideally 2, 3 goals. Example – 3 quarters ago, our focus was on performance. Our goal was “5x” (5 times faster). You want to create a question that anyone in the organization can be asked and/or ask. Is your work/job getting us closer to 5x.
– The problem is what you DON’T do, it’s not what you do. It’s what you are doing going to get me closer to this? We should be focusing on what gets you closer to the goal.
2.- You will get what you measure. Don’t set the wrong goal. Don’t set the wrong goal. It’s very important that you focus on the goals that get you where you want to.
– Overcommunicate your goal – To the point where it’s a joke in the business. Creates the environment that puts in people’s minds that what you really want to see is a grassroots level of that type of communication. Every time we have a new goal we have a new message in the bathroom stall. Half our team changes their email signatures that puts the goal. Someone pasted 5x on their door. If it’s not a joke, you’re not communicating enough.
3.- It’s all about measuring the outputs towards the goal – Jon is a fanatic of measuring outputs, not inputs. He doesn’t care how tough people are, if you are the smartest and most efficient, and you can measure the results and achieve them, then you’re good.
– People are focused on results – We are focused on goals, focused on what people are focusing. Measure the output towards achieving our goal. W
– Accountability agreement- I am accountable in sales for achieving the sales. Only if product can’t get me product, how can I be accountable. We treat people like adults, it goes both ways.
– When you are creating a goal, you have to create something that is transparent. You have to develop something that is transparent. You have to show me an agile, transparent goal. What we focus on is communicating the results of the goals that we set.
The red thermometer of United Way is updated every single day. Every week, detailed results are sent to every employee/investor/advisor of the business. It is absolutely clear where we are in terms of that goal. When you create that clarity in your business, you have created a way to measure that and it is amazing the behavior that you get to achieve it.
CONCLUSIONS.
The message tonight very simply is – I believe what goals get you to results. You have to articulate goals very clearly and simply, can’t be any longer time horizon than 30 days, over-communicate the goal to the grassroots level, and you need to be able to track the results of that goal every single day.
– Exercise – set down your goal – revise it every six months.
– Exercise – when will you be an entrepreneur?
– Exercise – set a personal goal for the next three months. He is going to post this on the VEF Leadership Linked In page. #mygoal a personal goal. Try it on a personal level. Feel free to Twitter it and put it on the LinkedIn and Momentum site.
QUESTIONS
I couldn’t really capture the questions, but Jon made it clear that you don’t want to over-achieve, you can fail, etc.
Minna’s question – how do you overcommunicate without putting stress on your team?
– You over-communicate and you want stress on your team. This is a startup. My company should not be a rent. There is no hard beat. If I am not running as fast as I can so that I can stand in my own feet. If you come work for me and we are hiring is really freaking stressful, but it’s fun and there are rewards.
– How if you are going from a grassroots perspective how do you prevent an easy goal to be set?
The type of people that we hire are the type of people who will fact you to win a sales battle. Competitive, assertive, so those are the type of people who will create stretch goals. In some cases, we have to rein the team in. Sometimes we tell the team “that’s unachievable, something better”.
Minna Van again – How many hours do you work a week?
My number one goal in life is to be a good father and parent. That is my number one goal clearly articulated. He works less than Minna does. How’s that for an answer?
I have always loved jazz, and I’ve attended several performances in the past few years. Vancouver always has great music festivals, and this is definitely not the exception. A few weeks ago, I was contacted by Darren Johner from Tourism Vancouver regarding the TD Canada Trust Vancouver International Jazz Festival (Coastal Jazz) and we discussed the possibility of covering some of the shows of the VIJFl (which takes place from June 26th to July 5th, 2009 – in other words, starts tomorrow!).
Credit: kimba
Unfortunately (and through no fault of his own, but mine completely) we couldn’t make arrangements for me to see the shows. However, that doesn’t mean that I can’t promote the festival, and possibly attend a few of the free performances, like my friends from Delhi 2 Dublin who will be at the David Lam Park on Saturday July 4th. My brother in soul and I have attended the VIJF every year since he moved to Vancouver so I suspect we are going to hit at least a couple of the free shows. In the mean time, if you want to buy tickets for the festival, you can do so by looking at the website and checking by location. I am sure there will be some amazing shows you will want to check out. As I mentioned above, Delhi 2 Dublin is at least doing one performance, and there will be many others worth checking.
Those who know me well, know that (contrary to some people’s beliefs) I’ve advocated many other causes other than just environment. I co-organized an unconference on social media and mental health, I’ve raised funds for charities that provide meals for HIV-afflicted people and for cancer research. But I’ve also been a very strong advocatefor a national policyon homelessness and for a compassionate approach to dealing with people who don’t have a home.
Credit: Public16
Recently, discussions on whether temporary shelters should close (particularly the one situated underneath the Granville Street bridge – I think that’s the one that people are referring to) have been heated, and some people have indicated that crime rates would go down should these shelters close.
I haven’t seen hard data (not even anecdotal evidence) on whether crime rates are high in the vicinity of homeless shelters. But I’m curious to know what people think? Do you support the Jun 30th closure of shelters? Or should they remain open?
NOTE – Be civil when dropping your comment. I will not hesitate to delete your comment if it’s inappropriate. Remember, I retain all editorial control.
I was too young when Charlie’s Angels went live, but it soon became a TV hit, and re-runs have continued to play even if they’re 30 years old. I always loved the song from the beginning and the premise (three gorgeous ladies who would solve crimes while still being glamorous and sexy). As a tribute to Farrah Fawcett (who recently passed away) you can find here the introduction to the first episode of Charlie’s Angels, courtesy of YouTube.
Rest in peace, Farrah Fawcett. You brought a lot of joy to many of us.
My dear friend Rebecca Bollwitt just announced to save the date for Blogathon 2009. Both Rebecca and I have Blogathoned for the past two years in a row (and she organized Blogathon Vancouver 2008), and in many ways, Blogathon marked both the beginning of my friendship with Rebecca and the blossoming of my blog and my social media presence in Vancouver. I would think our shared story with Blogathon has done a lot to strengthen our friendship. In fact, it was Rebecca who first encouraged me to participate and who helped me, step by step, to add a badge on my side bar (ah, the memories! I used to have a Blogspot blog then!). In previous years, I Blogathoned for A Loving Spoonful (2007) and for the BC Cancer Foundation (2008). This year, I had thought of doing a split between something mental health related and something associated to cancer. But upon further reflection, I already co-organized Mental Health Camp and I think that should be my volunteer effort in the field of mental health for 2009. Besides, my dear aunt MVL passed away with cancer last year. Therefore, in memory of my aunt and dedicated to a very good friend of mine from the blogging community who is also battling cancer, I am Blogathoning again for the BC Cancer Foundation. More info on the BC Cancer Foundation:
The BC Cancer Foundation is an independent charitable organization that raises funds to support breakthrough research and care at the BC Cancer Agency. The BC Cancer Agency is responsible for cancer care and control for everyone in British Columbia.
Over 70 years ago, the BC Cancer Foundation, led by a group of prominent BC citizens, created what is today the BC Cancer Agency[BC Cancer Foundation About Page]
In 2008, many of my friends Blogathoned and I had a series of fantastic guest-bloggers. It was a really fun event. Towards the end of the home stretch, Rebecca, Duane, John and myself hung out at Duane’s place and did our blogging from there. It was a lot of fun. I will be setting up a page for donations with BC Cancer Foundation in the next few days, but in the mean time, I just would like to encourage all of my Twitter friends, followers, blog readers to consider donating to my (or any of the other very worthy) causes. We will also appreciate encouragement in the form of in-kind donations for prizes for the Blogathoners, and possibly snacks/coffee sponsors. Remember, it’s 24 hours straight of blogging. For a good cause.