<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hummingbird604.com &#187; Amazon Ranked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hummingbird604.com/tag/amazon-ranked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hummingbird604.com</link>
	<description>The personal blog of a Vancouver-based educator in environmental issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Fail : Motrin moms Redux?</title>
		<link>http://hummingbird604.com/2009/04/12/amazon-fail-motrin-moms-redux/</link>
		<comments>http://hummingbird604.com/2009/04/12/amazon-fail-motrin-moms-redux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon Ranked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AmazonFail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hummingbird604.com/2009/04/12/amazon-fail-motrin-moms-redux/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title of this post and the idea of writing about the matter should be credited to Gus Fosarolli, a good friend of mine who has been reading on the matter. So what is Amazon Fail? So, it seems (from what I can read) that Amazon has shifted their algorithm for ranking of LGBT literature [...]
Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://hummingbird604.com/2008/11/20/no-motrin-moms-effect-on-crtcs-decision-on-net-neutrality/' rel='bookmark' title='No Motrin Moms effect on CRTC&#8217;s decision on net neutrality'>No Motrin Moms effect on CRTC&#8217;s decision on net neutrality</a></li>
<li><a href='http://hummingbird604.com/2007/07/29/the-world-urban-forum-urban-sustainability-redux/' rel='bookmark' title='The World Urban Forum: Urban Sustainability Redux'>The World Urban Forum: Urban Sustainability Redux</a></li>
<li><a href='http://hummingbird604.com/2008/05/04/when-all-my-abilities-fail/' rel='bookmark' title='When all my abilities fail'>When all my abilities fail</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title of this post and the idea of writing about the matter should be credited to <a href="http://www.gusdigital.com">Gus Fosarolli</a>, a good friend of mine who has been reading on the matter. So what is Amazon Fail? So, it seems (from what I can read) that Amazon has shifted their algorithm for ranking of LGBT literature on the basis of supposed sexually-explicit content. But it appears as though heterosexually-themed content that actually DOES have explicit sexual depictions is NOT ranked lower. </p>
<p>UPDATE &#8211; Via <a href="http://www.toddsieling.com">Todd Sieling</a>, who pointed me out to <a href="http://www.darrenbarefoot.com/archives/2009/04/the-thoughtlessness-of-internet-lynch-mobs.html">Darren Barefoot who in turn</a>, pointed me out to <a href="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/04/the-failure-of-amazonfail/">Clay Shirky&#8217;s write up on the fact that #amazonfail wasn&#8217;t actually what the collective belief was</a> (i.e. that it really was a technological glitch and not a human one). I am still on the fence on that one (simply because I don&#8217;t have the actual empirical evidence that it was actually that, a techno glitch), but I concur with Shirky (and Barefoot) in that we shouldn&#8217;t be so rushed to judge. </p>
<p>UPDATE &#8211; <a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/amazon/archives/166329.asp">The Seattle PI indicates a response by Amazon</a> saying it was an honest mistake, and that the algorithm caught a lot of books they did not intend to.</p>
<p>UPDATE &#8211; Now some guy who <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/brutal_honesty/3168992.html">supposedly is a hacker is taking responsibility</a>. And &#8211; <a href="http://bryant.livejournal.com/672165.html">somebody is denying that the troll&#8217;s code actually works</a>. So, it seems Amazon Fail is still a supposed glitch.</p>
<p>UPDATE &#8211; I&#8217;m amending this post with early, not-fully-ruminated thoughts on PR crisis management. I have been pondering about #amazonfail &#8211; <em>is it unreasonable to expect responses from Amazon, on Easter Weekend?</em> A few responses I got:</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.mynameiskate.ca">Kate Trgovac</a> &#8211; <em>Today, yeah, I think it is. Easter 2010 (or xmas 2009), probably not. Between this &#038; Motrin Moms, it&#8217;s a new era.</em></p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.tararobertson.ca">Tara Robertson</a> &#8211; <em> don&#8217;t do crisis mgmt PR, but their business is web based and this was a major mistake, they need to respond.</em></p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.hoggan.com/">Karen Cook</a> &#8211; <em> PR team undoubtedly huddling in Amazon&#8217;s boardroom crafting appropriate response.</em></p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.nobiliserotica.com/">Nobilis Reed</a> &#8211; <em>The world is now 24/7. Why do you think @werner has a Blackberry?</em></p>
<p><strong>Raul&#8217;s early lessons for PR crisis management, brand management and brand monitoring</strong></p>
<p>Bear in mind, it&#8217;s 2009 and we live in a web-based era, let&#8217;s face it. Internet 24/7.</p>
<p>1.- DON&#8217;T deploy anything new (business, algorithm, process) without ensuring that you&#8217;ll have AT LEAST ONE, high-ranked individual with enough PR/tech savvy to be able to address potential backlashes.</p>
<p>2.- DON&#8217;T assume that a boiler-template email response will appease customers.</p>
<p>3.- DON&#8217;T assume that just because it&#8217;s a weekend or a holiday, you can get away with anything. As mentioned above, the Internet is 24/7, particularly because the business is web-based, as indicated above by Tara and Nobilis. I agree with Kate that we are in a new world. However, I do think that Amazon should have learned a lesson from the Motrin Mom&#8217;s case. </p>
<p><strong>End Update</strong></p>
<p>UPDATE # 2 &#8211; I&#8217;ve included <a href="http://www.publishingtalk.eu/blog/bookselling/an-open-letter-to-jeff-bezos/">an open letter to Jeff Bezos by Publishing Talk</a> &#8211; Jeff Bezos is the CEO of Amazon (AMZN).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been tracking the <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23amazonfail">Summize search</a> for just a few minutes, but the pace at which the results are coming out is definitely out-pacing me. I concur with Gus. It seems as though we are witnessing another Motrin Moms in the making. </p>
<p>This is why crisis communications and PR/social media teams are so important &#8211; for when people screw up. As someone who fights for LGBT rights, I take issue with anything that denies basic rights and discriminates. I&#8217;ll have to read more to see whether that was the case with Amazon.</p>
<p>Anybody who knows more about the topic,  feel free to drop a comment. In the mean time, here is the definition of <a href="http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/amazonrank/">Amazon Ranked</a> (yes, it&#8217;s tongue-in-cheek)</p>
<blockquote><p>1. To censor and exclude on the basis of adult content in literature (except for Playboy, Penthouse, dogfighting and graphic novels depicting incest orgies).<br />
2. To make changes based on inconsistent applications of standards, logic and common sense. </p></blockquote>
<p>UPDATE &#8211; Commenters on my blog have started to describe in more detail what is going on with the Amazon Fail. Thanks! Keep&#8217;em coming. Also, my friend <a href="http://www.tararobertson.ca/blog/2009/amazon-fail/">Tara Robertson wrote about the fact</a>, her post includes links to action (send an email to Amazon, sign a petition). </p>
<p>UPDATE &#8211; <a href="http://markprobst.livejournal.com/15293.html">Mark Probst&#8217;s LiveJournal</a> includes the response from Amazon &#8211; following quote directly from his blog</p>
<blockquote><p>In consideration of our entire customer base, we exclude &#8220;adult&#8221; material from appearing in some searches and best seller lists. Since these lists are generated using sales ranks, adult materials must also be excluded from that feature.</p>
<p>Hence, if you have further questions, kindly write back to us.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Ashlyn D<br />
Member Services<br />
Amazon.com Advantage</p></blockquote>
<p>UPDATE &#8211; <a href="http://neteffect.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/04/12/amazonfail_and_the_politics_of_anti_corporate_cyber_activism">Morozov&#8217;s post on the politics of anti-corporate cyberactivism</a>. As someone who conducts research on citizen activism (<a href="http://www.raulpacheco.org/about">see my research blog</a>), I (Raul) am always fascinated by these mobilizations. Now, the thing is &#8211; these mobilizations occur online, in the comfort of our homes/offices.</p>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='http://hummingbird604.com/2008/11/20/no-motrin-moms-effect-on-crtcs-decision-on-net-neutrality/' rel='bookmark' title='No Motrin Moms effect on CRTC&#8217;s decision on net neutrality'>No Motrin Moms effect on CRTC&#8217;s decision on net neutrality</a></li>
<li><a href='http://hummingbird604.com/2007/07/29/the-world-urban-forum-urban-sustainability-redux/' rel='bookmark' title='The World Urban Forum: Urban Sustainability Redux'>The World Urban Forum: Urban Sustainability Redux</a></li>
<li><a href='http://hummingbird604.com/2008/05/04/when-all-my-abilities-fail/' rel='bookmark' title='When all my abilities fail'>When all my abilities fail</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hummingbird604.com/2009/04/12/amazon-fail-motrin-moms-redux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

