<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The painful process of writing academic book chapters/articles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hummingbird604.com/2008/11/22/the-painful-process-of-writing-academic-book-chaptersarticles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hummingbird604.com/2008/11/22/the-painful-process-of-writing-academic-book-chaptersarticles/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of a Vancouver-based educator in environmental issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: enkerli</title>
		<link>http://hummingbird604.com/2008/11/22/the-painful-process-of-writing-academic-book-chaptersarticles/comment-page-1/#comment-2552</link>
		<dc:creator>enkerli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hummingbird604.wordpress.com/?p=2534#comment-2552</guid>
		<description>(Came here through the &quot;possibly related posts.&quot;)

Excellent advice and very efficient strategy.
In your description of the difference between blog and academic writing, something could be said about the assumptions of academese.
Formal academic writing should &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; read like a conversation. It should also be fully referenced (especially in English-speaking academic contexts). And there&#039;s an expectation that every statement has been carefully weighed.
Nothing wrong about these assumptions. They make sense in the current academic climate (especially with publications in English). But isn&#039;t there some room between blog-style conversations and academic publishing? A place where we can discuss academic issues without needing to use the most formal style possible?
In my experience, academic mailing-lists have often been the most adequate context for these. And private conversations (on- or offline). Maybe we&#039;re ready to integrate these informal models in other settings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Came here through the &#8220;possibly related posts.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Excellent advice and very efficient strategy.<br />
In your description of the difference between blog and academic writing, something could be said about the assumptions of academese.<br />
Formal academic writing should <em>not</em> read like a conversation. It should also be fully referenced (especially in English-speaking academic contexts). And there&#8217;s an expectation that every statement has been carefully weighed.<br />
Nothing wrong about these assumptions. They make sense in the current academic climate (especially with publications in English). But isn&#8217;t there some room between blog-style conversations and academic publishing? A place where we can discuss academic issues without needing to use the most formal style possible?<br />
In my experience, academic mailing-lists have often been the most adequate context for these. And private conversations (on- or offline). Maybe we&#8217;re ready to integrate these informal models in other settings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

